Tenant Accountability Project

When landlords become lords.

Property management companies are using control over housing to conscript tenants into third-party financial platforms — for undisclosed financial benefit. When tenants resist, they face eviction. This site documents who does it and how.

Read the Cases Submit Your Story
1 Documented Cases
3 Companies Profiled
5+ Regulatory Complaints Filed
NC State of Origin

The Problem

The new landlord playbook.

Property management companies have discovered a new revenue stream: enrolling tenants in third-party rent payment platforms — platforms that generate transaction fees, credit card interchange revenue, and data licensing income — and making that enrollment mandatory as a condition of housing.

Federal consumer protection law requires explicit consent for enrollment in a third-party financial platform. The property managers doing this know this. The gap between what the law requires and what they do is not oversight. It is the business model.

When tenants resist — or when the mandatory platform fails — the same companies use the eviction system as a weapon. Nonpayment filings become the consequence of a payment system the tenant didn't choose and couldn't use.

This is not a niche problem. The CFPB has received hundreds of complaints documenting this exact failure mode. One platform — Bilt Rewards — ended its banking relationship with Wells Fargo amid documented fraud losses. The tenants who couldn't pay because the platform didn't work were the ones who got eviction notices.

Featured Case

RPM Living / Axis Crossroads

Cary, North Carolina — Wake County Case No. 26CV015708-910

The Setup

Mandatory Bilt Migration

RPM Living eliminated all existing payment methods — including in-office payment and RentCafe — and required tenants to enroll in Bilt Rewards. No free alternative was offered. The lease did not authorize this change.

Read the full case
The Failure

Platform Not Operational

RPM Living's own email confirmed Bilt "was not fully operational" as of April 1 — after the migration. An April 22 screenshot shows payments blocked. RPM Living filed for eviction on April 24.

See the evidence
The Escalation

Refusal of Payment in Writing

On April 28 — while a nonpayment eviction case was active — RPM Living refused payment in writing. A plaintiff in a nonpayment suit, refusing payment. This is documented.

Read the timeline
Systemic Issue

Pre-Filed Eviction Flag

Audio recording captures RPM Living staff confirming the tenant's account was flagged "evicted" in their system before the legal eviction filing — meaning the payment block preceded any legal authority to act.

Full evidence index

Company Profiles

Named and documented.

Factual profiles of companies whose conduct is documented on this site.

RPM Living

Property Management — National

Active Case

One of the largest third-party property management companies in the US. Manages Axis Crossroads (Cary, NC) under Cary Crossroads Owner LLC. Mandated Bilt enrollment, filed eviction after platform failure, refused payment in writing during active nonpayment case.

2026 First documented
1 Active cases
NC Jurisdiction

Loebsack & Brownlee, PLLC

Law Firm — Charlotte, NC

Opposing Counsel

Charlotte-based firm representing RPM Living / Cary Crossroads Owner LLC in Wake County summary ejectment proceedings. Attorney of record: Daniel Root. Conduct in this matter is subject to NC State Bar review.

2026 First documented
NC Jurisdiction

Bilt Rewards

Fintech Platform — New York, NY

Platform

Rent payment and rewards platform. Ended banking relationship with Wells Fargo amid documented fraud losses. Hundreds of CFPB complaints document payment failures of the type described in the RPM Living case. Property managers receive undisclosed transaction fee revenue from tenant enrollment.

CFPB Complaints on file
WF Exit Fraud-related
All Company Profiles

For Tenants

Know your rights before they file.

North Carolina law gives tenants specific protections that most tenants don't know exist until it's too late. A defective notice is a complete defense. Written refusal of payment by a landlord is documented evidence. The right to pay and stay is statutory.

NC G.S. 42-3

Notice Requirements

What makes a 5-Day Notice to Vacate valid — and what defects are complete defenses at summary ejectment.

Learn more
NC G.S. 42-34

Pay and Stay Rights

Your statutory right to pay rent owed and halt eviction proceedings — and what happens when a landlord refuses.

Learn more
NC G.S. 75-1.1

Unfair & Deceptive Trade Practices

How the UDTP statute applies to property management conduct — and why it matters beyond the courtroom.

Learn more
Full Resources Page

Your Experience Matters

Has this happened to you?

If a property manager forced you onto a payment platform, blocked your payments, or filed eviction while refusing your rent — your story is evidence of a pattern. Share it here.

Submit Your Story